Perbedaan Daya Hambat Bakteri dari Propolis Cair yang Ada di Pasaran Terhadap Escherichia Coli dan Staphylococcus Aureus Secara In Vitro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25077/jka.v4i3.373Abstract
AbstrakPropolis adalah zat yang digunakan lebah melindungi sarangnya dari berbagai ancaman. Komponen utama propolis adalah resin yang dikumpulkan lebah dan dicampur dengan air liurnya. Manusia juga menggunakan propolis sebagai obat berbagai penyakit, seperti infeksi bakteri. Propolis memiliki kemampuan antibakteri terhadap Escherichia
coli dan Staphylococcus aureus. Kualitas dan jenis propolis sesuai dengan komposisi kimia, iklim dan tempat berkembang biak. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah melihat perbedaan daya hambat bakteri Propolis cair 1 dan Propolis cair 2 yang ada di pasaran terhadap Escherichia coli dan Staphylococcus aureus secara in vitro. Propolis yang akan diuji adalah propolis cair yang ada di pasaran dipilih dua secara acak. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada bulan Januari 2013 di laboratorium Mikrobiologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Andalas. Jenis penelitian eksperimental
menggunakan metode difusi (metode cakram) dan analitik dengan menghubungkan perbedaan kedua propolis sebagai antibakteri. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan propolis cair 1 dan propolis cair 2 yang ada di pasaran tidak memiliki efek antibakteri terhadap Escherichia coli dan terdapat perbedaan daya hambat bakteri dari kedua propolis
terhadap Staphylococcus aureus. Propolis cair 2 (diklaim berasal dari Selandia baru) memiliki daya hambat bakteri yang lebih baik daripada propolis cair 1 (diklaim berasal dari Malaysia).
Kata kunci: propolis cair, perbedaan daya hambat bakteri, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus
Abstract
Propolis is substance which use to protect bee hive from various threat. The main component of propolis is resin which is collected and mixed with saliva. The human also use propolis as a treatment against various illness such as bacterial infection. Propolis has an antibacterial effect to Escherichia coli and Stahpylococcus aureus. The quality and type of propolis is also in accordance with chemical composition, climate and their breeding location. The objective of this study was to find out the differentiation of the antibacterial effect of Propolis 1 and Propolis 2 in the market to Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by in vitro. Propolis to be tested for this study is random liquid propolis in the market. Research was conducted in January 2013 in the laboratory of Microbiology Faculty of Medicine, University of Andalas. This type of study was the experimental diffusion method (disc method) and the analytic distinction owned by linking two of propolis as an antibacterial effect. These results indicate that propolis 1 and propolis 2 have no ability antibacterial effect to Escherichia coli, and both of propolis have differences antibacterial effect to Staphylococcus aureus. Propolis 2 (from New Zealand claimed) has antibacterial effect better than propolis 1 (from Malaysia claimed).
Keywords: propolis, differentiation of the antibacterial effect, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA 4.0) license that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).










